Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Jeffco Fair and 4-H Competition

I took the opportunity to visit this year’s Jeffco fair and to observe some of the 4-H competition on Saturday, August 9th and then I participated in the 4-H awards ceremony on August 10th. While I never participated in 4-H, it was good to attend and observe the dedication and commitment of these young people.

Last year I was reminded while visiting with a constituent that 4-H is not just for rural youth. Many who participate are "suburban kids." There is a wide variety of areas of involvement outside of just raising livestock and animals. The competition and preparation of the projects develops discipline, skill development and perseverance. It is obvious that the dedicated adults who are part of 4-H are committed to developing leadership in the participants.

The awards rally featured two 4-H youths as the MC’s of the event and the awards were handed out by fellow 4-H participants as well. It was obvious that this long standing tradition is still providing youth with a meaningful activity, opportunities to learn and develop leadership and character skills. Thank you to the parents, sponsors and other adults who make this organization a success. Congratulations to all participants and best of luck to those competing at the State Fair in a few weeks.

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Around the District



































































I enjoy connecting with constituents in various settings and listening to their concerns and discussing issues. House district 22 is an diverse district with a variety of demographic groups, income levels and perspectives on the issues facing Colorado.






















Tuesday, August 12, 2008

Uncontested Primary Elections - Needful or Wasteful?

Perhaps you noticed that the primary ballots for Republicans did not have any contested seats. As a result, your choice in voting for "one" was to vote for the name on the ballot or not to vote. Is this really necessary or is it just a waste of time and money for both government and taxpayers?

First of all, current state law requires that an election be held for all offices whether contested or not. For those who like to have a "perfect" voting record meaning that you vote in every election, it is important to complete your ballot and mail it in, or go to the polls on primary election day.

Some feel it is good exposure for the candidate to have their name on the primary election ballot, even if the race is uncontested. As I have visited voters, I tell them, checking my name is good practice for them in preparation for the November general election. There is also a concern for voter confusion. Primary elections are party elections.

It is possible, as in this year, for one party to have a contested election and the other not to. If a neighbor gets a ballot and I don’t does that mean that I was missed? Does it just mean that their political party has a contest election and mine does not? If I vote at the polling place, how do I know if I go to vote on the day of election or not?

This issue is one that is likely to be addressed even in this next session with some proposed legislation. It would seem that there would be some significant cost savings; however, it may not be as great as one would believe on first consideration. There is still cost involved in communicating with voters to ensure they understand if they need to vote at the polls or not, and to make sure they have not been overlooked in receiving their ballot in the mail.